PYSEC-2026-2466
Dulwich has unbounded memory allocation in receive-pack from crafted thin packs
Quick fix
PYSEC-2026-2466 — dulwich: upgrade to the fixed version with the command below.
pip install --upgrade 'dulwich>=1.2.5'Details
## Impact
An uncontrolled-resource-consumption (memory exhaustion) denial-of-service vulnerability (CWE-400 / CWE-789).
A client with push access could push a tiny crafted thin pack (~174 bytes) whose delta header declares a huge dest_size. When dulwich ingested it via add_thin_pack / apply_delta, it would allocate hundreds of MB of memory based on that attacker-controlled size, with no relationship to the actual bytes received.
Who is impacted: Operators running a Dulwich-based Git server that exposes git-receive-pack (i.e. accepts pushes) - for example via dulwich.server functionality, the HTTP smart server, or anything built on ReceivePackHandler.
## Patches
Patched in 1.2.5.
add_thin_pack now accepts a max_input_size keyword (bytes; 0/None = unlimited, matching git's semantics), and ReceivePackHandler reads receive.maxInputSize from the repository config and passes it through. Wire reads are counted and a PackInputTooLarge exception is raised once the cap is exceeded - equivalent to git index-pack --max-input-size.
Users should upgrade to Dulwich 1.2.5 or later and set receive.maxInputSize in their server's repository config to a sane bound for their environment.
## Workarounds
On unpatched versions, receive.maxInputSize has no effect, so it cannot be used as a workaround. Until upgrading, operators should:
- Restrict dulwich-receive-pack (push) access to trusted, authenticated clients only, or disable it entirely on servers that only need to serve fetches. - Run the server under an OS-level memory limit (e.g. ulimit, cgroups/MemoryMax, or a container memory limit) so a malicious push is killed rather than taking down the host.
## Resources
- git's receive.maxInputSize / git index-pack --max-input-size documentation - Reported by Liyi, Ziyue, Strick, Maurice and Chenchen @ University of Sydney
Are you affected?
Enter the version of the package you're using.
Affected packages
References
- https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/security/advisories/GHSA-xrvj-v92f-53gj[WEB]
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47734[ADVISORY]
- https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich[PACKAGE]
- https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/releases/tag/dulwich-1.2.5[WEB]
- https://pypi.org/project/dulwich[PACKAGE]
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-xrvj-v92f-53gj[ADVISORY]