RUSTSEC-2024-0021

In affected versions, after a `Report` is constructed using `wrap_err` or `wrap_err_with` to attach a message of type `D` onto an error of type `E`, then using `downcast` to recover ownership of either the value of type `D` or the value of type `E`, one of two things can go wrong:

- If downcasting to `E`, there remains a value of type `D` to be dropped. It is incorrectly "dropped" by running `E`'s drop behavior, rather than `D`'s. For example if `D` is `&str` and `E` is `std::io::Error`, there would be a call of `std::io::Error::drop` in which the reference received by the `Drop` impl does not refer to a valid value of type `std::io::Error`, but instead to `&str`.

- If downcasting to `D`, there remains a value of type `E` to be dropped. When `D` and `E` do not happen to be the same size, `E`'s drop behavior is incorrectly executed in the wrong location. The reference received by the `Drop` impl may point left or right of the real `E` value that is meant to be getting dropped.

In both cases, when the `Report` contains an error `E` that has nontrivial drop behavior, the most likely outcome is memory corruption.

When the `Report` contains an error `E` that has trivial drop behavior (for example a `Utf8Error`) but where `D` has nontrivial drop behavior (such as `String`), the most likely outcome is that downcasting to `E` would leak `D`.