VDB
Sign up
MEDIUM

GHSA-3pv8-6f4r-ffg2

tar has a PAX header desynchronization issue

Details

### Summary

When a tar stream contains multiple "header" entries prior to a file entry, tar-rs applies the PAX header (`x`) to the _next_ entry in the stream, regardless of type. For example, a stream of `x -> L -> file` (PAX, GNU longname, file) would result in `x`'s extensions being applied to `L` rather than to `file`.

[Per POSIX pax](https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/utilities/pax.html), this is incorrect: a PAX header always applies to a file entry, not any intermediary entries. See the "pax Header Block" section for the specific prescription there.

As a result of this, an attacker can contrive a tar containing a sequence of tar headers such that tar-rs applies the PAX header's `size` extension to the next header in sequence, effectively desynchronizing the stream and enabling tar-rs specific skippage/extraction of members. In other words, a file can be contrived to extract differently on tar-rs than on other tar parsers.

### PoC

[This tar](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/27141941/pax-overrides-extension-header.tar.zip) (zipped for size) demonstrates the desynchronization: with `tar tvf`:

``` % tar tvf tests/archives/pax-overrides-extension-header.tar ---------- 0 0 0 2048 Dec 31 1969 longname.txt ---------- 0 0 0 0 Dec 31 1969 file_b ```

with `tar-rs`:

``` ---- pax_size_does_not_apply_to_extension_headers stdout ----

thread 'pax_size_does_not_apply_to_extension_headers' (250476889) panicked at tests/all.rs:2121:27: called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Custom { kind: Other, error: "numeric field was not a number: AAAAAAAA when getting cksum for AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA" } note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace ```

In the above case, the PoC is not weaponized, so it jumps into the middle of an entry and subsequently fails the checksum test rather than silently continuing with attacker-controlled archive state.

### Impact

This is very similar to GHSA-j5gw-2vrg-8fgx and GHSA-fp55-jw48-c537 in impact -- an attacker can use this to extract (or not extract) files from a tar stream depending on the tar parser used, which in turn can be used to obscure the presence of malicious files.

Are you affected?

Enter the version of the package you're using.

Affected packages

crates.io/tar
Introduced in: 0Fixed in: 0.4.46

Upgrade tar to 0.4.46 or newer (ecosystem crates.io).

References