VDB
KO
MEDIUM 5.3

GHSA-r292-9mhp-454m

node-tar: Uncontrolled recursion in mapHas/filesFilter allows uncatchable stack-overflow DoS via crafted long-path tar with member selection

Quick fix

GHSA-r292-9mhp-454m — tar: upgrade to the fixed version with the command below.

npm install tar@7.5.21

Details

## Summary `node-tar` (npm `tar`) contains an uncontrolled-recursion stack-exhaustion DoS in the internal `mapHas` helper used by `filesFilter`. When a consumer calls `tar.t(...)` or `tar.x(...)` with a non-empty member-selection list, node-tar installs a filter that closes over the recursive `mapHas` (`src/list.ts:33-44`). `mapHas` walks an entry path upward one `path.dirname()` call per recursion **with no segment cap**. A single crafted tar with a GNU-`L` (or PAX-`x`) long-path header can deliver a path of tens of thousands of `/`-separated segments (up to `maxMetaEntrySize` = 1 MiB). The recursion overflows the call stack, throwing an uncatchable `RangeError` that terminates the Node process on async/streaming consumers.

## Root Cause `filesFilter` (`src/list.ts:27-51`) is installed whenever a caller passes a member-selection list (`src/list.ts:119-122`, `src/extract.ts:55-57`). Its filter is invoked at `src/parse.ts:253` (`entry.ignore = entry.ignore || !this.filter(entry.path, entry)`) inside `Parser[CONSUMEHEADER]` — and crucially **outside** the only try/catch in that method (which wraps `new Header` at `src/parse.ts:179-183`). `mapHas` recurses once per path segment with no depth limit. The `Unpack` `maxDepth` guard (`src/unpack.ts:342`, in `[CHECKPATH]`) only runs on the `'entry'` event, which fires *after* `CONSUMEHEADER` has already invoked the filter — so the stack overflows before any depth guard executes. `tar.t` (list) has no `maxDepth` at all.

## Impact Unauthenticated, remotely-triggerable denial of service: a ~188-byte gzip (≈26 KB tar) crashes any service that lists or extracts *selected members* from an untrusted archive (package registries, CI artifact/cache restore, upload processors). On async (`await tar.t(...)`/`tar.x(...)`) and streaming/`pipe` consumers the `RangeError` escapes the promise as an `uncaughtException` and terminates the process — standard defensive `try/catch` around the async call does NOT prevent it. (The synchronous API is catchable; the async/stream paths — the dominant server pattern — are not.)

## Proof of Concept ```js // Build a tar whose single entry has a GNU-L long path of ~12,000 "a/" segments (~26 KB), // gzip it (≈188 bytes), then have a consumer list/extract with member selection: const tar = require('tar'); await tar.t({ file: 'evil.tar.gz', gzip: true }, ['some-member']); // -> RangeError, process exit ``` Empirically reproduced on Node v24.18.0 against built `dist/commonjs` of node-tar 7.5.20: 188-byte gzip → 26,112-byte tar (12,000 segments) → uncaught `RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded` → process exit. A control run with no member-selection list (filter not installed) parses cleanly (exit 0), isolating `mapHas` as the sole cause.

## Attack Chain 1. **Entry.** Attacker crafts a tar with a GNU `L` (or PAX `x`) long-path header whose body is `"a/"`×~12000 (~26 KB), followed by a normal file entry. - **Guard:** `maxMetaEntrySize` caps the meta body at 1 MiB (`src/parse.ts:241`). - **Bypass proof:** 26 KB ≪ 1 MiB → accepted (verified: 26 KB archive parsed up to the filter). 2. **Trigger.** Victim service calls `tar.t({file},[sel])` or `tar.x({file,cwd},[sel])` (member selection — a documented, common API). - **Guard:** `Unpack.maxDepth` (default 1024) at `src/unpack.ts:342`; decompression-ratio guard. - **Bypass proof:** `maxDepth` lives in `[CHECKPATH]` on the `'entry'` event, which fires *after* `CONSUMEHEADER`'s filter call — the crash occurs before it (extract exits 1 with default maxDepth). `tar.t` has no maxDepth. Ratio is ~139× (trivial); no total-bytes cap applies to the uncompressed meta body. 3. **Sink.** `this.filter(entry.path)` → `mapHas` recurses once per `/` segment (`src/list.ts:39`). - **Guard:** try/catch in `CONSUMEHEADER`. - **Bypass proof:** the only try/catch wraps `new Header` (`src/parse.ts:179-183`); the `this.filter(...)` call at `src/parse.ts:253` is outside it. The `RangeError` propagates out of the stream write/`'data'` path → uncaught exception (verified: `process.on('uncaughtException')` fires; async `await`+`try/catch` does NOT intercept). 4. **Impact.** Node process termination; a 188-byte gzip crashes any consumer that lists/extracts selected members from untrusted archives.

## Bypass Evidence - `mapHas` recursion is member-name-independent: the crash fires even when the requested members do not match the malicious entry path — the attacker only needs the consumer to *use* member selection. - Standalone `mapHas` overflows at 20k–30k segments; on the real streaming path (atop `write → CONSUMECHUNK → CONSUMEHEADER → filter`) it crashes at ≤8k segments (finder's ~12k estimate is accurate for the reachable path). - Control (no member list → no filter) parses cleanly (exit 0), isolating `mapHas`.

## Affected Versions `<= 7.5.20` (npm `tar`). `mapHas` present verbatim on tag `v7.5.20` (latest GitHub release and npm `dist-tag latest`); no segment/depth cap in `src/list.ts` or the `CONSUMEHEADER` filter path; HEAD == 7.5.20, no unreleased fix.

## Suggested Fix Rewrite `mapHas` iteratively (walk `dirname` in a `while` loop with a segment/visited cap), or enforce a hard path-segment limit in `Header`/`Parser` independent of `maxMetaEntrySize`, applied before any per-entry filter runs.

## Dedup Note Distinct from CVE-2024-28863 / GHSA-f5x3-32g6-qm9j "lack of folders depth validation" (that bounds `mkdir` recursion during *extraction* via `maxDepth` in `Unpack[CHECKPATH]` on the `'entry'` event — a different sink, code path, and fix; runs after the filter and does not apply to `tar.t`). Also distinct from the PAX NUL/numeric-path crash advisories (improper-input-to-fs / type confusion, not recursion) and the gzip-bomb advisory (resource exhaustion on disk writes). None touch `list.ts`/`filesFilter`/`mapHas` or require member selection.

--- Reported by **zx (Jace)** — GitHub: @manus-use

Are you affected?

Enter the version of the package you're using.

Affected packages

npm / tar
Introduced in: 0 Fixed in: 7.5.21
Fix npm install tar@7.5.21

References