GHSA-8c4j-f57c-35cf
Langflow: Authenticated Users Can Read, Modify, and Delete Any Flow via Missing Ownership Check
Details
## Vulnerability
### IDOR in `GET/PATCH/DELETE /api/v1/flow/{flow_id}`
The `_read_flow` helper in `src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/flows.py` branched on the `AUTO_LOGIN` setting to decide whether to filter by `user_id`. When `AUTO_LOGIN` was `False` (i.e., authentication was enabled), neither branch enforced an ownership check — the query returned any flow matching the given UUID regardless of who owned it.
This exposed any authenticated user to:
- **Read** any other user's flow, including embedded plaintext API keys - **Modify** the logic of another user's AI agents - **Delete** flows belonging to other users
The vulnerability was introduced by the conditional logic that was meant to accommodate public/example flows (those with `user_id = NULL`) under auto-login mode, but inadvertently left the authenticated path without an ownership filter.
---
## Fix (PR #8956)
The fix removes the `AUTO_LOGIN` conditional entirely and unconditionally scopes the query to the requesting user:
```diff - auth_settings = settings_service.auth_settings - stmt = select(Flow).where(Flow.id == flow_id) - if auth_settings.AUTO_LOGIN: - stmt = stmt.where( - (Flow.user_id == user_id) | (Flow.user_id == None) # noqa: E711 - ) + stmt = select(Flow).where(Flow.id == flow_id).where(Flow.user_id == user_id) ```
All three operations — read, update, and delete — route through `_read_flow`, so the single change covers the full attack surface. A cross-user isolation test (`test_read_flows_user_isolation`) was added to prevent regression.
---
## Acknowledgements
Langflow thanks the security researcher who responsibly disclosed this vulnerability:
- **[@chximn-dt](https://github.com/chximn-dt)**
Are you affected?
Enter the version of the package you're using.
Affected packages
0 Fixed in: 0.5.1 pip install --upgrade 'langflow-base>=0.5.1'